For the CFO
You are asked to sign for controls you can only sample.
The representation you make is that controls operated. What actually operated is a sample, applied after the money moved, by people who ran out of month before they ran out of invoices.
What you are measured on
- Cash conversion and outflow discipline
- Clean audit, no material weakness, no surprises in the review
- Statutory exposure — GST credits reversed, TDS shortfalls, MSME interest
- Finance headcount against a growing transaction volume
Where the leak hits your number
Roughly 3% of outflow, spread across six ordinary failures. On $120 million that is $3.6 million, and none of it appears as a line item — it appears as margin that was always going to be that.
What changes in your week
- Control adherence becomes a number you can quote, not a hope
- Findings arrive with the invoice attached, before payment, not as a post-mortem
- The statutory clocks — MSME 45 days, GST filing, TDS thresholds — are scheduling constraints rather than year-end discoveries
- Volume grows without the AP team growing with it
What you would ask in the first meeting
01
What can the agent reach, and who decided that?
02
What happens when it is wrong?
03
Does anything have to move out of my ERP?
04
What does it cost me to find out if it works?
Nothing moves. An agent inherits the signed-in user's scope and cannot exceed it. Ambiguity produces a named question rather than a silent pass. And finding out costs one export.
Ninety days of invoices answers this better than a meeting.
One export, findings back within a working day, with the invoice attached to each.
$Check your savings→